This is an oral order in a contempt case where the court accepted that the impugned order was compliant, the contempt was purged, and discharged the rule nisi, closing the case.
Rule nisi against the respondent was discharged. Contempt case closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
CONTEMPT CASE No.155 OF 2020
(Through physical mode)
B. Karunakar Reddy, S/o Siva Shankar Reddy, Aged about 52 years, R/o D.No.87-560/1, Srinagar Colony, Kurnool City-518 002.
..Petitioner
Versus
Sri Kiran Kumar, Tahsildar, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupathi, Chittoor District.
…Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Babuji Tenneti.
Counsel for the respondent : GP for Revenue
ORAL ORDER
Dt:14.10.2022
that the order, alleging wilful and deliberate violation of which this contempt case is filed, has been duly complied with and the contempt has been purged.
2
3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ
Nn
3
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
C.C.No.155 of 2020
Dt:14.10.2022
Nn
B. Karunakar Reddy
Sri Kiran Kumar
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
