Dismissed
Ajmira Venkateswara Rao v. The State of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh HCWP/9699/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO W.P.No.9699 of 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO W.P.No.9699 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.9699 of 2020
ORDER:
Heard Sri Suresh Kumar Potturi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K. Madhava Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd respondent-temple.
The petitioner had obtained leasehold rights over an extent of Ac.1.66 cents in Rs.No.2/3 and Ac.4.03 cents in RS.No.29 of land situated in Elukapadu Village, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District for the period from 2017-18 to 2019-20. The respondents had initiated auction of the leasehold rights of the temple, for the year 2020-21, by way of public auction dated 23.06.2020. Aggrieved by the proposed auction, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition.
The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled to extension of one year lease period on account of the shut down of all activities due toCOVID-19 pandemic.
This Court by order dated 04.06.2021 had granted stay of dispossession of the petitioner from the land in question for a period of four weeks. The said interim order was extended from time to time.
The prayer in the writ petition was to continue the petitioner in the said land for the year 2020-21. On account of the interim orders of this Court, the petitioner has remained in possession till now. As the petitioner has obtained the benefit of the prayer in the writ petition, nothing remains in this writ petition.
RRR,J 2 W.P.No.9699 of 2020
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
8th July, 2021 Js.
RRR,J 3 W.P.No.9699 of 2020
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.9699 of 2020
8th July, 2021
Js.
RRR,J 4 W.P.No.9699 of 2020
Petitioner
3rd respondent-temple
R. Raghunanadan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court