Ginjala Bhoomayya v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO W.P.No.3655 of 2021…
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO W.P.No.3655 of 2021…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.3655 of 2021
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already handed over the licenced premises to the respondent-temple and hence nothing survives in the writ petition and the same has become infructuous.
The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
5th July, 2021 Js.
RRR,J 2 W.P.No.3655 of 2021
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.3655 of 2021
5th July, 2021
Js.
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court