Petitioner's counsel stated the matter was settled, causing the writ petition to become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.27462 2008
ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.Praveen Kumar)
Ms.Akhila, learned counsel representing Sri K.Sarva Bhouma Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, stated that the cause in this writ petition does not survive as the matter is settled between the parties and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
_______________________________ JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
Date : 30.11.2021 AMD
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No.27462 2008
Date : 30.11.2021
AMD
Sri K.Sarva Bhouma Rao
State
C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
RAVI NATH TILHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
