Sri S.V. Narayana Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive text; the petitioner's counsel stated no further orders were required, and the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
No substantive text; the petitioner's counsel stated no further orders were required, and the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
W.P. No.21950 OF 2018
ORDER:-
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleaders for Mines & Geology appearing for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further orders are required in this Writ Petition.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this case stand closed. Interim orders granted if any, stand vacated. No costs.
______________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH
Date :17.02.2021
EPS
2
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH
W.P. No.21950 OF 2018
Date : 17.02.2021
EPS
D. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court