The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning suspension pending enquiry. It directed the respondent authority to conclude the enquiry within eight weeks; failure to do so would automatically vacate the suspension order.
Direction to conclude enquiry within 8 weeks; failure results in automatic vacation of suspension order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU WRIT PETITION No.10043 of 2021
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B. Ramesh Yalavarthy representing Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, learned Special Counsel for N.R.E.G.S. appearing for the respondents.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
_________________________________ JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Date : 15-06-2021 ARR
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
WRIT PETITION No.10043 of 2021
Date: 15-06-2021
ARR
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent to conclude the suspension enquiry within a fixed time limit.
Whether to vacate the suspension order automatically if the enquiry is not concluded within the specified period.
Unknown Petitioner
Unknown Respondent No.3
N.R.E.G.S.
D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
