Revision filed against dismissal of an application seeking handwriting comparison of a disputed sale deed. This court dismissed the revision, noting that a certified copy is unfit for such comparison and that the petitioners must take steps to produce the original document.
The civil revision petition was dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1384 of 2021
ORDER:
The petitioners herein had filed O.S.No.97 of 2015 in the Court of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada for a declaration of title and consequential injunction against the defendant/respondent herein in relation to the suit schedule property.
2
would be served in sending such a certified copy for comparison with the service register of late Nakka Polaiah.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO Date : 14.12.2021 SPP
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1384 of 2021
Date : 14.12.2021
SPP
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the petitioner's application to send a certified copy of a disputed sale deed for handwriting and fingerprint comparison with the municipal service register
Whether this court can require parties to summon the original document when the petitioners had failed to take such steps.
The Petitioners in Civil Revision Petition No.1384 of 2021
The Defendant/Respondent in O.S.No.97 of 2015
R Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
