The High Court held that the petitioner could not maintain a criminal petition based merely on a notice rather than an operative order under Section 46 of the A.P. Excise Act. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable.
Criminal Petition dismissed as not maintainable; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Criminal Petition No.3684 of 2021
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
________________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Date:16.07.2021. cs
1 provisions across 1 enactments
petitioner
respondents
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
