Writ petition challenging notice under A.P. Assigned Lands Act quashed on interim basis due to pending order, directing concerned authority to pass decision within two weeks and prohibiting dispossession pending expiry of time.
Respondent directed to pass appropriate order within two weeks and refrain from dispossession pending such order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Writ Petition No.1485 of 2020
ORDER:
wp_1485_ 2020
Rule 3 of Rules framed under the Act 9 of 1977 in 2007, explanation was submitted by the petitioners, within the time stipulated in the notice, in Form-II, but order is not yet passed by fourth respondent. Therefore, at this stage, question of interference with possession and enjoyment of petitioners does not arise.
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Dated 03.02.2020 Note: Issue C.C by 07.02.2020 b/o Rvk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice issued under Section 3 of A.P. Assigned Lands Act is sustainable where time for submission of reply has not expired?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
First, Second and Third Petitioners
Tahsildar, Chebrolu Mandal, Guntur District
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
