Single Judge dismissed Writ Petition directing respondents to consider a representation. Appellants challenged the order citing lack of notice. Held, since appellants' rights were not affected, appeal dismissed.
Writ Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
AND
HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
WRIT APPEAL No.355 OF 2020
(Taken up through video conferencing)
JUDGMENT : ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Rakesh Kumar)
RK,J & JUD,J W.A. No.355/2020
2
none of the rights of the appellants have been infringed by the order of the writ Court, the Court is of the opinion that there is no reason to interfere with the order of the learned single Judge.
________________________ RAKESH KUMAR, J
________________________ J.UMA DEVI, J Date: 09-11-2020. Dsh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing the writ petition without notices infringes the audi alteram partem principle?
Whether an appeal should be interfered with if no rights of the appellants were affected?
APPELLANTS
WRIT PETITIONER
RAKESH KUMAR
J.UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
