Seemala Viswanadhamand 3 Others v. Seemala Satyanarayana
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition No. 4522 of 2014 was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear or advance arguments despite listing.
Civil Revision Petition No. 4522 of 2014 was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear or advance arguments despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4522 OF 2014
ORDER :
On 04.12.2020 this petition was listed, but there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Registry is directed to list this matter to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even, today also, when the revision petitioner is called, neither the counsel nor any other person on behalf of the petitioner were appeared and advance arguments.
Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 11.12.2020 IS
2
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4522 OF 2014
Date: 11.12.2020
IS
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court