Default dismissal of the Writ Petition for failure of the petitioner to appear and file representation, coupled with lack of proof of service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MSRM,J & JUD, J W.P.No.9470 of 2019
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M. SEETHARAMA MURTI
AND
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.9470 of 2019
ORDER : (Per the Honourable Sri Justice M.Seetharama Murti)
As there was no representation for the petitioner on 26.08.2019 and as proof of service was not filed, we directed that this writ petition be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
Today, when this writ petition is listed under the above caption, yet again, there is no representation for the petitioner. Learned standing counsel
for City Union Bank Limited appearing for the respondents is present.
The above conduct of the petitioner indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
In the result, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to
costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed.
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J
J.UMA DEVI, J
IKN
14th October, 2019
Petitioner
City Union Bank Limited
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI
J. UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
