The writ petition was dismissed for default as no representation was filed on behalf of the petitioner despite listing under 'For Dismissal'.
Petitioner to appear at court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Writ Petition No.2470 of 2001
ORDER :
On 12.12.2019, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, in spite of the matter being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Counsel for the respondents appeared on all the occasions.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
17th December, 2019
skmr
Petitioner
Respondents
C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
