Jammula Kumari v. The Andhra Pradesh and 5 others
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT…
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.2392 OF 2019
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P. Prabhakar Rao represented that he is the Counsel on record as on date and his name is also printed in the cause list. But a memo is filed stating that Sri Siva Sankara Rao Borra filed vakalat without obtaining any no objection from Sri P. Prabhakar Rao. But Sri P. Prabhakar Rao represented that he has no objection, if he is discharged from the case and accordingly, Sri P. Prabhakar Rao is discharged.
The petitioner appeared in person before this Court and identified by present Counsel Sri Siva Sankara Rao Borra, she stated that she is not interested to prosecute the proceedings, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the same. In view of representation by the petitioner personally and Counsel Sri Siva Sankara Rao Borra, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequently miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 16.12.2019 Rvk
Unidentified Petitioner
Respondent (Unidentified)
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court