Vyjayanthula Shyavashya v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed from the court for default due to the total absence of the petitioner for hearing on two consecutive dates.
The Writ Petition was dismissed from the court for default due to the total absence of the petitioner for hearing on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 20397 OF 2018
ORDER:
When the matter was called on 08.07.2018 under the caption ‘for orders’, for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner either in the morning or in the afternoon, as such the matter was directed to be posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the morning or in the afternoon. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO
18th July, 2019 anr
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 20397 OF 2018
18th July, 2019
anr
M. G. Ganga Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court