Thoti Anjinappa, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge stated that the present Writ Petition is covered by a prior order and disposed of accordingly.
Single judge stated that the present Writ Petition is covered by a prior order and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION NO.19028 of 2019
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Government Pleader that the issue in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order in Writ Petition No.44336 of 2018, dated 12.12.2018. A copy of the said order is placed on the record.
Operative portion of the said order reads as follows:
“In view of the above, the 3rd respondent is directed to receive and register the documents presented by the petitioner, if the same are in order as per the provisions of Indian Stamps and Registration Act and the Rules made thereunder, and if the subject land is not included in the list of prohibited properties for registration as per Section 22-A of the Act or not prohibited for registration by any order/injunction passed by the Court or competent authority. If he wants to refuse registration, he shall record reasons and communicate the same to the parties.”
Following the above said order and for reasons recorded therein, the present Writ Petition is disposed in terms thereof. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
__________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
02.12.2019 MP
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court