The Court held that the inaction of respondents in completing the inquiry against the sixth respondent was arbitrary. It directed the respondents to complete the inquiry within three months from the date of the order.
Directed Respondents 2 to 5 to complete the inquiry against the sixth respondent within three months from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Writ Petition No.1430 of 2019
ORDER:
______________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Dated 04.12.2019 Rvk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents' inaction in completing the inquiry against the sixth respondent pursuant to a suspension order is illegal and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India?
Whether this Court can direct the respondents to complete the pending inquiry within a specified time frame?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
Respondents 2 to 5
Sixth Respondent
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
