This Writ Petition will not detain this Court for long. Having regard to the relief claimed by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, questioning the deductions made from his salary by the drawing officer pursuant to the two attachment orders passed by the competent civil Courts in two Execution Petitions filed against him in execution of the valid decrees passed in two separate Suits against him, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner got a right to approach the said civil Courts i.e. the Junior Civil Judge, Pulivendula and the Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa, which passed the attachment orders in E.P.No.25 of 2017 in O.S.No.212 of 2016 and in E.P.No.111 of 2017 in O.S.No.93 of 2016, pending on the file of the respective Courts and pursue the remedies available to him under Section 60 of CPC. The petitioner, who is the judgment-debtor in both the above E.Ps, got ample right to approach the Executing Courts and oppose the attachment orders passed against him on the basis of the legal grounds available to him, if he is of the opinion that the said two attachment orders were passed in utter violation of the provisions of Section 60 of CPC. The petitioner, without approaching the two Executing Courts as judgment-debtor and pursuing his lawful remedy in the said Courts, approached this Court by invoking its extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to hold that the said attachment orders are illegal and violative of Section 60 CPC.
