Whileso, recently on 23.07.2019 the 3rd respondent published a list of names, who are going to be shifted from the existing posts to other sections. The name of the petitioner is also shown in the list. Therefore, the petitioner has to attend counselling on 24.07.2019. It is informed that the employees working at one place for the last three years are going to be shifted to another section and that they have to opt the section. The grievance of the petitioner is that except the computer section, no other section is suitable to his health condition. Therefore, he made a request to the respondents to consider the same and retain him in the present computer section itself. However, the same is not considered till now. Therefore, he has filed the present Writ Petition seeking a declaration in the nature of writ of mandamus that the action of the third respondent in subjecting the petitioner to counselling as per notification dated 23.07.2019 to shift him to other section from computer section and in not considering his representation, dated 24.07.2019, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the computer section itself.
