The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. v.Ramalingeswara Rao and 3 Others.
Case brief
What is this about?
Ms. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI M.A.C.M.A.No.413 OF…
Ms. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI M.A.C.M.A.No.413 OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
M.A.C.M.A.No.413 OF 2013
JUDGMENT :
The contents of the proceeding sheet show that on 24.06.2019, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and it was adjourned by four weeks under the caption “for dismissal”. On 14.08.2019, when the matter came up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. However, to provide one more reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant, the matter was again directed to be listed on 04.09.2019 under the same caption. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is also no representation on behalf of the appellant. This conduct of the appellant shows that he is not having any interest to prosecute the case.
Under these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Date.11.09.2019 Gk
2
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
M.A.C.M.A.No.413 OF 2013
11.09.2019
Gk
J. UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court