The Single Judge Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of representation on the hearing date and subsequent dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
MACMA.No.1660 of 2006
ORDER:
On 03-09-2019, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 14.10.2019. Even today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It indicates that the petitioner is not diligent in pursuing the matter. Hence, this court is left with no other option except to dismiss the revision petition for default.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed
for default. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________ M. GANGA RAO, J
Date: 14-10-2019
sdp
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO
MACMA. No.1660 of 2006
Date: 14.10.2019
sdp
M. GANGA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
