Dismissed¶14

Syed Hasan Mehdi Zaidi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC23 Apr 2026WTAX/502/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), WRIT TAX No. - 502 of 2026 - Syed Hasan Mehdi Zaidi v. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others; writ petition dismissed for default on April 23, 2026 owing to petitioner's non-appearance; no statutory provisions, precedents, issues or monetary quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for default, none having appeared for the petitioner and the petitioner appearing no longer interested in pursuing it. ¶14

Syed Hasan Mehdi Zaidi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT TAX No. - 502 of 2026

¶3

Syed Hasan Mehdi Zaidi

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Lokendra	Kumar Gupta,	Mirza
	Humayun Singh	Qadar, Ravendra	Pratap
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Sha	ilendra Singh Chauh	an

¶9

Court No. - 3

¶10

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.

¶11

None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition.

¶12

Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents is present.

¶13

It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the writ petition.

¶14

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

¶15

(Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶16

April 23, 2026 Ashutosh

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Syed Hasan Mehdi Zaidi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Hasan Mehdi Zaidi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Urban Development Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Pragat and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 7 Others

M/S Associated Jute Industries Thru. Its Partner Shri Aditya Agarwal and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Agri. Lko and 2 Others

Ms. Rima Dwivedi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tourism Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Aepl Anup Enterprises (Opc) Private Limited Thru.Owner/Proprietor,Anup Kumar Kushwaha and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko.and 4 Others

M/S M.K. Service Provider and General Order Suppliers Thru. Partner Madan Kumar Pathak vs Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment Thru. Secy. Shastri Bhawan New Delhi and 7 Others

Raj Kumar Ojha vs Distt. Judge/Chairman of Allotment Committee Distt. and Session Court Lko. and 3 Others