Vinay Pathak v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3832…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3832 of 2026 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. At the outset, the present writ petition is confined to the recovery of
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3832 of 2026
Vinay Pathak
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Sanjay Kumar Mishra |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 39
HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
- At the outset, the present writ petition is confined to the recovery of road tax being made against the petitioner with respect to motor vehicle bearing registration number UP 54 T 8131.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WTAX/3832/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court