Dismissed¶¶9
Smt. Renu and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/8987/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, WRIT - C No. 8987 of 2026, Smt. Renu & Anr. v. State of U.P. & 3 Ors., decided 18.03.2026 by Vivek Kumar Singh, J. Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioners' counsel in revised call; interim order, if any, vacated. Procedural order only — no merits adjudicated, no issues framed, no statutes or precedents cited. Petitioners' counsel: Akhilesh Bharti, Kamlesh Prasad; State-respondents represented by C.S.C. and P.K. Tiwari, Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared on behalf of the petitioners in revised call although counsel for the State-respondents was present. ¶¶9