Adjournment order; Allahabad High Court; Writ - C No. 6684 of 2026; Jumman v. State of U.P. and 9 Others; Manish Kumar Nigam, J.; counsel for petitioner not prepared; matter listed after one week; no merits decided; no precedent value.
Adjournment — matter to be listed after one week; no relief granted or denied on merits. ¶12
The matter was adjourned and directed to be listed after one week to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to prepare his case; no substantive issue was decided. ¶12
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 6684 of 2026
Jumman
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 9 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
March 25, 2026
Ved Prakash
Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be adjourned, as learned counsel for the petitioner was not prepared with his case.¶11
The matter was adjourned and directed to be listed after one week to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to prepare his case; no substantive issue was decided.ratio¶12
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
