Disposed¶12

Shiv Shankar Yadav v. Cane Commissioner State of Up Lucknow and 4 Others

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2026WRIC/562/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

cane commissioner; cane development; inquiry report dated 27.01.2026 by Senior Cane Development Inspector; cause of action no longer exists; writ petition disposed with liberty to challenge inquiry report; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; WRIT - C No. 562 of 2026; Shiv Shankar Yadav; decision dated March 17, 2026; bench Shekhar B. Saraf and Manjive Shukla, JJ.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate action in law against the inquiry report dated 27 January 2026, if so advised. ¶12

Shiv Shankar Yadav vs Cane Commissioner State of Up Lucknow and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 562 of 2026

Shiv Shankar Yadav

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Cane Commissioner State Of Others	Up	Luckno	w And 4 .....	Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	:	Arvind Mishra	Pratap Singh,	Ram Krishn
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:	C.S.C.,	Ratnesh Chandra,	Tushar Mittal

¶7

Court No. - 3

¶8

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4 and Shri Tushar Mittal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.5.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has submitted an inquiry report dated 27th January, 2026 carried out by the Senior Cane Development Inspector, which is taken on record. A copy of the same has been handed over to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner today in Court.

¶11

In light of the inquiry having been carried out, we are of the view that the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer exists.

¶12

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to take appropriate action in law against the inquiry report, if so advised.

¶13

(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶14

March 17, 2026

¶15

Ashutosh

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shiv Shankar Yadav v. Cane Commissioner State of Up Lucknow and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Shankar Yadav v. Cane Commissioner State of Up Lucknow and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swabhimaan Finance Pvt. Ltd. Lko. Thru. Managing Director Karunesh Nigam and Another vs Deputy Labor Commissioner Saharanpur Distt. Saharanpur U.P. and 2 Others

Ruman vs State of U.P. Thru. Rahat Ayukta Lko. and 2 Others

Ram Chandra Singh vs Distt. Magistrate Lko. and 2 Others

Sonmati vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. U.P. and 2 Others

Vishun Dai vs Distt. Magistrate Distt. Lko./Land Acquisition Officer First Distt. Lko. and 3 Others

M/S New Jain Medical Hall Thru. Proprietor Smt.Shikha Jain vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Medical Health/Family Welfare Lko. and 2 Others