Vipin Singh and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 14 Others
Writ petition under Article 226 – disputed questions of fact
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; WRIT - C No. 4572 of 2026, decided 11.5.2026 (Amitabh Kumar Rai, J.; Alok Mathur, J.). Keywords: Article 226; writ jurisdiction; disputed questions of fact; chak road; kharanja road; bhumidhari land; Gata No. 137 min.; co-sharers; partition; Section 116 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; easement; customary rights; pathway; public road; Village Newada Kalan; Tehsil Sadar; District Pratapgarh; Writ C No. 1017 of 2026; writ petition disposed.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief granted; writ petition disposed of, with the court recording that co-sharers may apply under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for partition and that easement claims lie before the court of competent jurisdiction. ¶20