Naresh Kumar Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Energy U.P. Lko. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ-C 4136 of 2026; Naresh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P.; UPERC; Works of Licensees Rules 2006 Rule 3(3); District Magistrate Lucknow rejection; revision to be decided within two months; reasoned and speaking order; tower/pole installation without notice, consent or compensation; Gata No.456 Saray Karora Mohanlalganj Lucknow; impleadment of UPERC as respondent no. 7; interim relief to be considered expeditiously; decided 30.04.2026.
What did the court decide?
Direction to UPERC (newly impleaded respondent no. 7) to decide the petitioners' revision (Annexure-12) with all expedition, preferably within two months from production of a certified copy of the order, strictly in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, ensuring communication of the decision to the petitioners forthwith; any application for interim relief to be considered expeditiously in accordance with law.