Mohd. Khaliq v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged Tehsildar's eviction order over 0.001308 hectare in Khasra No.53, affirmed on appeal, contending the survey map was defective and proceedings violated prescribed Section 67 procedure. Court granted time for counter affidavit, stayed operation of the impugned orders, but restricted new construction or third-party rights.
What did the court decide?
Operation and effect of impugned orders dated 18.06.2025 and 15.09.2025 stayed until next date of listing; petitioner restrained from new construction or third-party rights.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 41207 of 2025
Mohd. Khaliq
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Mohd. |
Arif |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., |
Kaushal Kishore Mani |
Court No. - 55
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
- Heard Sri Mohd. Arif, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Azad Rai holding brief of Sri Kaushal Kishore Mani, learned counsel for respondent no.5/Gram Sabha and learned Standing Counsel for the Staterespondents.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the eviction order under Section 67(1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is valid given alleged defects in the survey map and procedure.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohd. Khaliq
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
4 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/41207/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Prakash Padia
- Order 2 — this page · Prakash Padia
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court