Dismissed¶13

Anoop Singh Tomar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC19 Mar 2026WRIC/39209/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mutation proceedings; maintainability of writ petition; exceptional circumstances; registered sale deed; SDM (J) order dated 30.10.2024; Revisional Court impugned order dated 10.06.2025; no remand; summary proceeding creates no right of title; State of U.P.; Board of Revenue; Allahabad High Court; Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar 2019 (3) SCC 191; Smt. Kalawati 2022 (2) ADJ 456; Gangaram Mishra Writ C No.41243/2025; writ dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Except in exceptional circumstances, a writ petition arising out of mutation proceedings is not maintainable. ¶7

Anoop Singh Tomar vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 39209 of 2025

¶3

Anoop Singh Tomar

¶4

	Versus	.....Petitioner(s)
State Of U.P. And 4 Others		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Sushil Ulajhan	Kumar Tiwari, Singh Bind
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 32

¶5

HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

¶6

None present for the parties except learned Standing Counsel.

¶7

The Court finds that this petition is arising out of mutation proceedings, therefore, except in exceptional circumstances, writ is not maintainable.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel has rightly pointed out that initially mutation was not carried out on basis of registered sale deed by an order dated 30.10.2024 passed by the SDM (J), however, it was interfered by Revisional Court, vide impugned order dated 10.06.2025, which has power to do so, therefore, there was no question to pass an order of remand, as such Revisional Authority has rightly interfered.

¶9

Court takes note of judgments of Supreme Court in Smt. Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar (D) through LR vs. Arthur Import and Export Company & Ors., 2019 (3) SCC 191 as well as of a coordinate Bench of this Court in Smt. Kalawati v. The Board of Revenue, 2022 (2) ADJ 456 as well as Gangaram Mishra vs. State of U.P. and 6 others, Writ C No.41243/2025 that writ is not normally maintainable as well

¶10

WRIC No. 39209 of 2025

¶11

¶12

as mutation proceedings does not create any right of title being a proceeding of summary in nature.

¶13