Ram Dev Mathur v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37587…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37587 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. None present on behalf of petitioner. 2. Sri P. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel submitted that prayers made in this writ petition are against a private company namely; PNB Metlife India
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37587 of 2026
Ram Dev Mathur
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Laxmi Kant Shukla |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
- None present on behalf of petitioner.
- Sri P. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel submitted that prayers made in this writ petition are against a private company namely; PNB Metlife India Insurance Company, therefore Court finds that in normal circumstances, writ jurisdiction cannot be entertained, still in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case any application is filed by the petitioner before the aforesaid Insurance Company, about payment of unpaid salary, same will be considered by the said Insurance Company in accordance with law, if there is no other legal impediment.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/37587/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court