Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37519…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37519 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Bhawesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. Petitioner, an outgoing Pradhan, has faced two
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37519 of 2026
Vinod Kumar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: Bhawesh Pratap Singh : C.S.C. |
|---|
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
- Heard Sri Bhawesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.
- Petitioner, an outgoing Pradhan, has faced two inquiries. One for alleged embezzlement and subsequently under Section 95(1)(g) of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/37519/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court