Premila Yadav v. State of U.P. and 9 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37289…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37289 of 2026 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. The sole prayer in this petition is that we should issue a mandamus to the District Magistrate, Azamgarh to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated
Disposed 3 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37289 of 2026
Premila Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Upadhyaya, Rajesh Kumar Roy Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 2
HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
The sole prayer in this petition is that we should issue a mandamus to the District Magistrate, Azamgarh to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 31.07.2026 annexed as Annexure 1 to the petition.
This Court in exercise of our powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, does not recommend cases of one litigant to the other for favourable consideration unless the petitioner seeks some substantive relief from this Court.
We are of clear opinion that a writ petition for the mere decision of a nonstatutory representation is not maintainable.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/37289/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court