Pankaj and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36440…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36440 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Petitioner is basically aggrieved by the objection being
Disposed 9 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 36440 of 2026
Pankaj And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 4 Others | .....Respondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Ashutosh |
|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
- Heard Sri Ashutosh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
- Petitioner is basically aggrieved by the objection being raised by the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 in removing a tamarind tree which is fallen upon the land of the petitioner.
- It is contended that tree was standing quite away from the land in question, which is subject matter of dispute in Writ - C No.- 8928 of 2007 but since it has been fallen upon the land of the petitioner, entire dispute is being created. It is submitted that he has already having an order of stay as to his possession qua the land in question and, therefore, there should no issue with the Sub Divisional Magistrate directing for removal of tree.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/36440/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court