Neeraj Garg v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. -…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36238 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jainendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent- bank and learned Standing Counsel
Disposed 9 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 36238 of 2026
Neeraj Garg
| Versus .....Petitioner(s) |
|
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others | .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Sandeep Kumar Srivastava |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Jainendra Kumar Mishra |
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
- Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jainendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent- bank and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
- By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus to command the respondent concerned to de-freeze the account of the petitioner being No.- 153202000001017 maintained with Indian Overseas Bank, Branch Tejgarhi, District - Meerut.
- Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the account has been freezed primarily on a complaint received from the Investigating Agency for there being doubtful transactions in his account.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/36238/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court