Hansraji v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36021…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36021 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Preetam Kumar Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akhileshwar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2.
Disposed 11 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 36021 of 2026
Hansraji
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
| .....Resp | ondent(s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Pramod Kumar Kumar Bharti |
Pandey, | Preetam |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
||
| Court No.- 29 |
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
- Heard Shri Preetam Kumar Bharti, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akhileshwar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
- The instant writ petition has been filed inter alia for the following relief:
"A. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authority to consider the matter after conducting a serious and impartial investigation, if the Rasta has been constructed in any way, legally or illegally and inviting objections, we should be heard and compensation amount should be given to us. If the land of the petitioner has been acquired/occupied by any department in an illegal manner, then initiate the legal procedure against the officer involved in the said matter.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/36021/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court