Ashok Kumar Jain v. Senior Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. -…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35672 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. 2. The
Disposed 12 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35672 of 2026
| Ashok Kumar Jain | Versus .....Petitione |
|---|---|
| Senior Manager | .....Responden |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Parijat Srivastava, Shadab Alam |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Kaushalendra Nath Singh |
.....Petitioner(s) Versus
.....Respondent(s)
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority.
- The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that when the petitioner received a notice with regard to non payment of installation charges of water connection, he paid the same under protest. Post payment of the installation charge under protest, a representation has been made by the petitioner to the 1.7.2026 stating that, in fact, only one water connection has been given to the petitioner and that the installation charge for the other connection has wrongly been charged.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/35672/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court