Disposed¶10

Keshmata Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko and 2 Others

Allahabad HC8 Jun 2026WRIC/3433/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; Writ - C No. - 3433 of 2026; Keshmata Yadav v. State of U.P. (through Commissioner and Secretary, Board of Revenue, Lucknow) and 2 others; order dated June 8, 2026 by Rajnish Kumar and Rajeev Bharti, JJ.; petitioner's counsel conceded no urgency; matter listed for the first week of July 2026 immediately after fresh cases; pure adjournment/listing order - no issues framed, no holdings, no statutes or precedents cited; not citable on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Keshmata Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 3433 of 2026

Keshmata Yadav

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko And 2 Others	.....Resp	ondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janendra Kumar Kumar Verma	Verma,	Deepak
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

¶7

Court No. - 2

¶8

HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that there is no urgency in the matter.

¶10

List in the first week of July 2026 immediately after fresh cases.

¶11

(Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)

¶12

June 8, 2026

¶13

Akanksha Sri/-

¶14

Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Keshmata Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Keshmata Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kusuma Shukla ( in Aadhaar Kusum Shukla ) vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology New Delhi and Another

Pooja Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko and 10 Others

Phoolmati vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

M/S Shiva Insulation Thru. Proprietor Bande Matram Patel vs Branch Manager Punjab National Bank Branch Durgaganj Distt. Pratapgarh and Another

Mamta Baranwal vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. and 2 Others

M/S M.v.Wasni Construction Thru.Proprietor Ajay Kumar Verma and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others