Sarita Pathak v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33471…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33471 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the
Disposed 29 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 33471 of 2026
Sarita Pathak
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others | .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Jitendra Yadav |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
| Court No.- 37 |
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
- Heard Sri Jitendra Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the state-respondents.
- The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent no.2/Tehsildar (Judicial), TehsilSadar, District Azamgarh to decide the Case No.972/2025 (Computerized Case No.T202515060100972) (Sarita Pathak vs. Lalman), under Section 34/35 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within the stipulated period."
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/33471/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court