Hari Ram v. State of U.P. and 9 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32213…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32213 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that writ petition be dismissed as not pressed. 2. In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ
Disposed 36 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 32213 of 2026
Hari Ram
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 9 Others
| .....Respondent(s) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Kamlesh Shrama |
|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Bhupendra Kumar |
Tripathi, C.S.C. |
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
- Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that writ petition be dismissed as not pressed.
- In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/32213/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court