Aditya Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32205…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32205 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of the parties in the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.
Disposed 36 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 32205 of 2026
Aditya Singh And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. And 7 Others | .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Kamlesh Shrama |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. |
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
- Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of the parties in the writ petition during course of the day.
- Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned Counsel for Gaon Sabha and Mr. Nand Lal Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
- The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/32205/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court