Rajendra Prasad v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants four weeks to file a counter affidavit in the interest of justice. It is a procedural listing order that does not dispose of the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 31160 of 2025
Rajendra Prasad
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Nirankari, Ranjeet Sonker Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
- It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite time granted by this Court, till date no counter affidavit has been filed.
- In the interest of justice, four weeks and no more time is granted to file counter affidavit.
- Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajendra Prasad
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Coram
Prakash Padia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/31160/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Manish Kumar Nigam
- Order 2 — this page · Manish Kumar Nigam
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court