Dismissed¶17

Pranav Suman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026WRIC/27126/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pranav Suman v. State of U.P.; WRIT - C No. 27126 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; GNIDA demarcation; Plot no. 212A Pocket-1 Saini Greater Noida Gautam Buddh Nagar; mandamus; possession certificate 28.09.2020; transfer deed 19.10.2020; Transfer Memorandum 16.10.2020; application dated 14.05.2024; no cause of action survives; Mahesh Chandra Tripathi J.; Kunal Ravi Singh J.

What did the court decide?

The instant writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous, the contesting respondent having stated that actual physical possession has already been handed over to the petitioner and no cause of action survives. ¶17

Pranav Suman Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 27126 of 2025

Pranav Suman

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Santosh Kumar Singh, Utkarsh Prakash Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C., Vineet Pandey

¶7

Court No. - 21

¶8

HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Sri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel for the contesting respondent.

¶10

The instant writ petition has been preferred praying inter alia for the following relief :-

¶11

"(1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. to fix the boundary and demarcate the Plot no.212A area about 70 sq.M situated at Pocket-1 Block, Saini, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, in pursuant to the possession certificate dated 28.09.2020 as well as Transfer deed for lease hold right dated 19.10.2020 being executed in favour of petitioner in compliance of Transfer Memorandum dated 16.10.2020 issued by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority.

¶12

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent No.3, to decide the petitioner's application dated 14.05.2024 and reminder application dated 03.07.2024, 10.10.2024, 11.11.2024, 27.11.2024, 26.11.2024, 02.12.2024 and 31.01.2025 in the office of respondent no.3 before the GNIDA Authority for demarcation of the boundary of the plot no.212A situated at Pocket 1, Saini Gautam Buddh

¶13

WRIC No. 27126 of 2025

¶14

¶15

Nagar."

¶16

Sri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel for the contesting respondent on his instructions, submits that actual physical possession has already been handed over to the petitioner and no cause of action survives, as such the instant writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous at this stage.

¶17

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous .

¶18

(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)

¶19

May 5, 2026 Sumit S

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pranav Suman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pranav Suman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akhilesh Pandey vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Green Avenue Buildtech Private Limited and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Babita Agarwal vs State of U.P. & 2 Others

Rani and 2 Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 Others

Narendra Kumar Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Babita Agarwal Vs State of U.P. & 2 Others