A writ petition by a home finance company against the State of U.P. and others was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel, upon reconsideration, sought permission to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 12789 of 2025
Icici Home Finance Company Ltd. Thru. Authorised Officer
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajit Singh, Deepak Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 3
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)
February 10, 2026
Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Icici Home Finance Company Ltd. Thru. Authorised Officer
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
4 Others (Respondents 2-5)
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
