Disposed¶9

Phoolmati v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC3 Apr 2026WRIC/12701/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Phoolmati v. State of U.P. and 6 Others; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; WRIT - C No. 12701 of 2026; Manish Kumar Nigam, J.; adjournment order; time granted to Standing Counsel to seek instructions; list after two weeks; April 3, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim adjournment: two weeks' time granted to the learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions; matter to be listed after two weeks. ¶9

Phoolmati vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 12701 of 2026

Phoolmati

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 6 Others

¶7

	...	..Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Jitendra Prasad Radheshyam	Kushwaha,
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Rameshwar Pras	ad Shukla
Court No.- 36

¶8

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

¶9

Two weeks' time is granted to the learned Standing Counsel to seek instructions in the matter.

¶10

List after two weeks.

¶11

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

¶12

April 3, 2026

¶13

Rama Kant

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Phoolmati v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Phoolmati v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Krishna Pandey vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Amit vs State of U.P. and Another

National Insurance Company Limited vs Smt. Maya Devi and 3 Others

Behari Lal Mishra vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Roshni and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Kabir and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others