Canara Bank Thru. Authorized Officer,Sri Rishikesh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 10 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Canara Bank writ petition (WRIT - C 11856/2025) against State of U.P. Home Department and others, disposed of by Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (Court No. 3; Shekhar B. Saraf, J. and Manjive Shukla, J.) on 06.01.2026 as infructuous: bank's grievance redressed, possession delivered to the bank and onward to auction purchaser/respondent No. 11; no cause of action remaining; no merits decided; no statutory provisions or case law cited; useful only to trace factual closure of a bank-possession/auction-purchaser dispute.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioner's grievance was redressed and possession was handed over to the bank and thereafter to the auction purchaser (respondent No. 11), no further cause of action remained and the writ petition was consigned to record and disposed of without adjudication on merits. ¶¶10