M/S Sammohan Advertising through Its Proprietor/Chief Execut v. Iind Additional Civil Judge Lko.and Ors. Objection Filed
Case brief
What is this about?
Bare dismissal order, no substantive adjudication. Keywords: dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner and counsel; discharge of interim order; consigned to record; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Court No. 6; Jaspreet Singh, J.; WRIT - C No. 1000001 of 2008; decided November 11, 2025. Parties: M/S Sammohan Advertising Through Its Proprietor/Chief Execut (petitioner); Iind Additional Civil Judge Lko. and others (respondents). Counsel: Avnish Saxena and Anurag Srivastava for petitioner; C.S.C. and Amit Sharma for respondents (Amit Sharma also referred to as counsel for the Bank). No statutes cited; no cases cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
As none appeared for the petitioner and Shri Amit Sharma, learned counsel for the Bank, was also absent, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution; the matter is consigned to record and any interim order, if any, stands discharged.