Shantanand Alias Ghanshyam v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4175…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4175 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 4175 of 2026
Shantanand Alias Ghanshyam
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others | .....Respondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Anshul Kumar Agarwal |
Singhal, Vinod Kumar |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
|
| Court No.- 50 |
HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is for issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the Consolidation Officer, Sadar Prayagraj, respondent no. 3 to decide the application preferred by the petitioner dated 11.08.2025, under Section 52 (2) of UPCH Act read with Rule 109 of UPCH Rules, within the time frame fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application is pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the aforesaid application.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/4175/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court