Disposed

Zakir Ali v. the Board of Revenue U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC17 Sept 2026WRIB/4173/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction for timely consideration of a stay application and revision relating to a land dispute. It directed the Board of Revenue to consider the stay application after hearing the parties within two months from presentation of the certified copy and to decide the revision within a further four months.

What did the court decide?

Respondent no. 1 was directed to consider and pass orders on the stay application within two months from presentation of the certified copy, after hearing the parties, and to decide the revision within a further four months in accordance with law.

Zakir Ali Vs the Board of Revenue U.P. and 3 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - B No. - 4173 of 2026

Zakir Ali

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

The Board Of Revenue U.P. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Dr.Om Prakash Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 51

¶10

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State.

¶12

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon respondent no.1 to decide the Revision No.1774 of 2024, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶13

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the revision filed by petitioner before respondent no.1 is pending consideration since 2024. More than two years have passed but neither the revision has been admitted nor the stay application has been considered. The contesting respondents have put in appearance. The matter is being listed for final disposal but the adjournments are being granted without any justifiable reasons. As the respondents in revision are creating third party interest in the land in dispute, the consideration of the stay application is urgent.

¶14

Considering the urgency in the matter, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no.1 to consider and pass necessary orders on the stay application filed alongwith the aforesaid revision, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of two months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. The respondent no.1 shall also ensure that the revision itself is decided, in accordance with law, within a further period of four months, thereafter.

¶15

September 18, 2026 Anil

¶16

(Arun Kumar,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Zakir Ali v. the Board of Revenue U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zakir Ali v. the Board of Revenue U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases