Radhika v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4167…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4167 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is hereby
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - B No. - 4167 of 2026
Radhika
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
| .....Respondent(s) | |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Mayank Krishna Singh Chandel, Vinod Kumar Chandel |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
| Court No.- 50 |
HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
The limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is to issue a direction to the respondent no. 2 i.e. Consolidation Officer Sadar, Mau, to decide the proceedings of Case No. 1274 of 2025 under Section 12 of UPCH Act, within the time frame fixed by this Court.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/4167/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court